Special Agent Pigg
Posted by oliver550
I had a tough time reading Pigg’s “Coordinating Constant Invention: Social media’s role in distributed work.” Although I found the majority of her article to be convoluted and lacking conciseness, it was her observation of participants in a coffeehouse that I couldn’t look past. I questioned everything from her description of the coffeehouse to the participants she used and how she chose them. I will go through her process and ask the questions I had when reading Pigg’s article.
1-Pigg picked an independent coffeehouse, on major avenue, which links the university and government districts-
Q1-Where is this establishment? Certainly people in Minnesota would have different habits from people in California which would have different habits from people in New York. What season was it? Again, this would dictate behaviors and which clientele frequented and stayed at this establishment. Why an independent coffeehouse? Isn’t Starbucks the most prestigious coffeehouse? Was the study looking for anti-establishments types that avoided chain restaurants?
2-Pigg observed for 6 weeks, 5 days a week, at varying times of the day-
Q2-Where these observation times random? Did she do it in her spare time? If she observed before work, after work, and sometimes on lunch or breaks, she would fail to see a true representation of people frequenting the coffeehouse. Was there a systematic approach to observing the patrons? Did she creep around and spy on people? Did she sit in a corner? Was she in the same spot every day or different spots at different times? What happened when someone confronted the creepy lady that kept staring at people all the time? Surely this would have altered people’s behavior. The necessary explanation by Pigg to keep people from asking for her removal from the building would have changed their behavior.
3-Pigg selected four patrons that would be ideal case study participants-
Q3-How many did she select initially? Did she select four and all four were willing to be part of the study? Did she select ten and only four gave consent? Were these people professional writers getting paid for their work? Were they black, white, Asian, affluent, poor, single, or did they have kids? Did they have an option to go to an office and chose to go to the coffeehouse instead?
4-Pigg videotaped the participants to see the interaction between the bodies and technologies-
Q4-Have you ever been in a coffeehouse and had to fart, pick your nose, scratch your wherever places, or just sit and space out for 15 minutes? If you were being recorded, would you participate in any of the activities mentioned above? Regarding the camera pointing at the computer/phone screen. Would you visit a naughty site, sext a significant other, look at a racy email, post an inappropriate picture, or carry on an extremely personal Instant Messenger conversation knowing that it was all being recorded and you had signed your rights away? Would you go out for five cigarettes an hour or spit your Copenhagen into a cup knowing you were being recorded? It’s absurd to think that the recordings were a 100% truthful representations of the participant’s day.
These are just four small pieces that bothered me. They may seem trivial and petty, but I think an honest answer to any of them could have far reaching implications for the study. The lack of scientific methods in this study brings its credibility into question. The basic point that I got from this article was that Pigg maintains that workers, technical writers in particular, are moving more towards non-conventional freelance roles. In doing so, they use social media to create the conventional “office space” around them. By using social media, they can essentially carry their office with them no matter where they choose to rest their laptop that day. They use social media to replace the office chit chat, the exchange of ideas and suggestions, and the personal interaction that they all go without due to the writer’s ever changing locations. I agree with her conclusions, but I don’t believe the study helped me get there.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.