Blogging inexperience and relating to Heidi Glick’s article.
The only blogging I have done is for Dr. Pignetti’s Rhetorical Theory course this past Spring. I didn’t do very well because I was overscheduled and didn’t put as much time into it as I would have liked. My classmates produced some very professional-looking, well-rounded posts, and mine were just blah. I’m going to use the first part of my post to make sure I can figure out how to post photos and videos.
Ok, so I kind of figured out how to add a photo. That’s my son, Tucker and our dog, Trooper. Pretty dadburn cute, eh?
And now to try a video…
This is taking longer. My video is on Facebook and it won’t let me download it from there… Calling for backup (husband)… Backup is not helping. Too bad, because it was going to be a cutesy video of Tucker at the pigeon park in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
I’ll go to my tried-and-true, although not very nice, video:
It’s only funny because the guy wasn’t permanently injured. And because anyone who watches gymnastics is secretly hoping something like this happens.
And I just realized the caption in my above photo has left the building. *sigh* Pick your battles, girl. Pick your battles.
In regard to our readings, I can relate to Heidi Glick’s article, Four Generations of Editors. I am 33 years old. My boss/stepdad/educational benefactor/person who generally runs my life is 71 years old. He moved my family from Stevens Point eight years ago so I could work for him and put me through college. Some days I have no idea why he did this, when it seems I can’t do anything right in his eyes. He drives me absolutely nucking futs with what he thinks is important, and I’m sure he’s wondering what he has to do to get me to do things correctly. It’s not just our age and the “times” in which we’ve grown up, which is the article’s main focus. We butt heads most strongly when it comes to correspondence between our company and our customers. Government contracting is not about “customer service” in the traditional sense. It’s about delivering exactly what the contract calls for – no more, no less. I completely understand this, in that we are not dealing with the general public and our pricing is carefully determined so that we are competitive yet still turn a profit. However, he insists on writing letters that come across as very “snippy,” with overwrought legalese that I can’t imagine any recipient taking the time to figure out the actual message, and a demeaning tone. He considers this the best way to get the recipient to respond in our favor, he has been doing it this way for 40 years, and he’s not going to change. I prefer a more friendly, “we’re all on the same team, so let’s work together to get this done” approach to customer correspondence, which he sees as weak and ineffective. I suppose we are editors, two generations apart. In the end, he is the owner of the company, and my job is to do things the way he wants them. Deep down I know he doesn’t completely disagree with everything I do, or he wouldn’t let me get anywhere near our company’s correspondence.
Also, it’s funny that the article specifically mentions double-spacing between sentences as antiquated. As you can probably tell, I still use two spaces between sentences, and I’m not going to change it. I think I sound like someone familiar…